BS10012 is the British standard that specifies the requirements for a personal information management system (PIMS). By defining a best practice approach for managing personal information, the standard makes it possible for management and external auditors to assess an organisation’s compliance with, among other things, the requirements of the DPA. BS10012 is intended for use by organisations of all sizes in the public, private and not-for-profit sectors.

IT Governance’s DPA Compliance with BS10012 Documentation Toolkit includes step-by-step guidance on establishing a BS10012 PIMS and provides a complete set of the necessary documentation, from a Fair Processing Notice through to a procedure for handling Subject Access Requests. The toolkit also shows how to integrate a BS10012 PIMS with an ISO27001 information security management system.

Alan Calder, Chief Executive of IT Governance, says: “The Data Protection Act sets out eight principles for securely managing personal information, but offers no guidance on how these principles should be adhered to. It can therefore be very difficult for management to know if it is doing the right thing, which is worrying when non-compliant organisations can suffer heavy fines and reputational damage.”

“BS10012 therefore comes as a welcome relief, as it sets out an approach to DPA compliance that is clear and can be independently tested,” Calder continues. “With the Information Commissioner increasingly keen to punish DPA compliance offenders, there is no time to waste. That is why the DPA Compliance with BS10012 Toolkit contains everything an organisation needs to implement this standard without delay.”

The DPA Compliance with BS10012 Documentation Toolkit is priced at £249.95/US$373.02/€274.90 and may be ordered for immediate download at: http://www.itgovernance.co.uk/products/2975.

Related posts:

1. Help with health and safety for SMEs UK Health and Safety Consultants EDP encouraged SMEs to look...
2. Easy way to build a business iPhone app United Planet has incorporated a special “page wizard” with Intrexx...
3. Managers do not understand the risks of working alone A survey conducted by the NHS revealed that only 50%...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The rules state that all businesses must be able to prove that debit and credit details are kept in a central location that is safe from fraud, such as in an approved electronic database.

However, most small business owners say that they would be happy to follow the rules, if there was more information about how to regulate or implement an appropriate system.

SMEs that are in violation of the rule must pay fines that are around a few pence for every transaction that comes through their store.  This of course adds up to a much larger amount by the close of the year.

The main complaint is that the fines are not properly being assessed, with some banks failing to flag the fines, and other businesses facing fines even though they are in compliance with the new regulations.

National chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses John Wright stated that the new measures were put in place to help improve data security but that small businesses were not considered when they were first introduced.

Even more disturbing perhaps is the fact that the banks that provide processing services to UK businesses have full discretion over how much they want to charge SMEs for breaking the rules.  Among the banks in the UK that asses fines are Lloyds, RBS, and HBOS.

Related posts:

1. SME’s need more Government help Chairman of the FSB (Federation of Small Businesses), John Wright,...
2. The Chancellor gives, but also takes from SMEs Leaders of many of Britain’s small companies have stated that...
3. Credit Card Interest Rates At 12 Year High As MBNA Launch Low Rate Deal Despite the UK taxpayer bailing out most of the...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Research from Remploy and ComRes found that only eight percent of all SMEs that do not currently employ disabled people have any interest about learning if disabled people could work at their companies.

Since SMEs make up about 99% of all the UK businesses the research is disappointing for those who may have learning disabilities or mental health issues since it shows that SMEs are not likely to employ them.

Today only an estimated one out of every five SMEs will hire a disabled person, but out of those about two thirds reported they would not hire someone with mental health issues or a learning disability.

Two thirds of the employers in the survey reported that they do not need support on the legal ramifications of the disabled laws, and also do not need any information about hiring people with disabilities.  Out of these only half even knew the provisions outlined in the Disability Discrimination Act.

Chief executive of Remploy, Tim Matthews, stated that in general businesses are usually worried about the reliability of people with disabilities versus “normal” workers but that in his experience with Remploy those with disabilities are often more likely to take fewer days off work and stay at their jobs longer.

He continued to say that the amount of people with disabilities who currently hold a job is scandalous when compared to how many people would like to have a job.

Related posts:

1. Are your IT systems protected from former employees? Research commissioned by the security division of Bell Micro, has...
2. FSB wants clearer SME maternity leave rules The Federation of Small Businesses stated that maternity leave regulations...
3. CBI outlines plans for any new government The CBI will release a new manifesto for business that...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The commission found that while advertisers may be able to build campaigns with other broadcasters, the channel has too much dominance to be considered part of a level competitive playing field.

The main issue at stake was the Act rights renewal system which ranks the prices of advertising on ITV by the amount of viewers. The system was formed for use by ITV when the broadcaster was originally formed to keep it from abusing its power as a dominant player in the market.

The good news for ITV is that the commission did state that ‘some variations’ of the current system may be open for change such as a proposal to widen what is classified as ITV1 and the inclusion of ITV1 high definition channels.

Additionally, the commission is also looking at the best way to determine competition matters by splitting air time into normal viewing audiences and special viewing audiences such as when a sports programme is being broadcast or a major entertainment show such as X Factor. Its final decision will be released by the end of 2009.

In the mean time, ITV has also been engaged in its own battle to keep consumers as they are leaving to choose digital channel broadcasting and the internet as an advertising competitor.

Since 2007 ITV has watched its shares decrease from 100p down to 50p last night when word of the decision started to float around.

Media analyst stockbroker Paul Richards of Numis Securities said that it was expected that the commission would not remove the CRR system but that the wording of the statement of the commission was much harsher than most people expected to hear at this stage in the decision making process.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.